![]() ![]() Under intermediate scrutiny, the government must show that the challenged classification serves an important state interest and that the classification is at least substantially related to serving that interest. Under the rational basis standard, the court determines whether there is any rational justification for the classifications created by a challenged rule, which must further a "legitimate governmental interest". has modestly increased since the early 1960s., Political power refers to the influence over a government's. ![]() has remained relatively constant since the early 1960s. has risen steadily since the early 1960s. Strict scrutiny is at the opposite end of the spectrum for the rational basis test used. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Americans' trust in their government (24) A. If the analysis discusses a compelling interest that is narrowly tailored to achieve its goals, it is a strict scrutiny analysis. The language of the court's opinion indicates the level of scrutiny applied. Strict scrutiny is applied in cases where there is a real and appreciable impact on, or a significant interference with the exercise of a fundamental right. There must not be any less restrictive means that would accomplish the government?s objective just as well. The lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny. It is part of the hierarchy of standards that courts use to weigh the government s interest against a constitutional right or principle. Also, the means to achieve the purpose, objective, or interest is reviewed to determine if it is "narrowly tailored" to the accomplishment of the governmental purpose, objective, or interest. Strict scrutiny is the most stringent standard of judicial review used by United States courts. The purpose, objective, or interest being pursued by the government must be "compelling". The strict scrutiny standard is the most thorough analysis. It is a level of scrutiny applied to classifications that are alleged to violate constitutional rights to equal protection of the laws. They may determine whether an act by the President, Congress, a national, state, or local administrative official, a state legislature, a local governing board, or a lower court is valid. Strict scrutiny is one level of analysis used by the courts to determine the constitutionality of the actions of other governmental bodies. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |